GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Mojo · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Mojo

6Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mojo was named 1 time in Dialers, where Aloware led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business22 of 58

under the label threshold

Mid-market66 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mojo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	0%	66 of 76	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aloware at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mojo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mojo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mojo — recent reviews mention false advertising concerns, a clunky workflow, and poor refund/support experiences.” GPT-5.4 mini · Dialers · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mojo, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mojo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JustCall5 of 60Not in the top three

Allo4 of 64Not in the top three

CloudTalk4 of 60Not in the top three

PhoneBurner3 of 60Not in the top three

Aircall2 of 60Not in the top three

Kixie2 of 60Not in the top three

Skipcall2 of 60Not in the top three

Apollo.io1 of 60Not in the top three

DialedIn1 of 60Not in the top three

Dialpad1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mojo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named Mojo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com1

g2.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Mojo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/p/127612/SalesDialers-com1

capterra.com/p/157853/JustCall/reviews1

capterra.com/p/207288/Mojo/reviews1

g2.com/categories/auto-dialer1

g2.com/products/dialedin/reviews1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mojo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mojo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mojo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.