Every category where a model named Allo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	14%	4 of 76	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Allo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Allo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained21 labels13

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“these dialers are generally more reliable: - Allo (4.7/5 on G2, single-line progressive, transparent pricing at $45/user)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · negative prompt · first choice

“Allo is the best overall value — a genuine power dialer starting at $32/user/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · budget prompt · first choice

“Allo stands out as one of the best sales dialers (specifically a power/progressive dialer)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Dialers · budget prompt · first choice

“🏆 Best Overall Value: Allo ... Allo ($32/month yearly) - Best overall value” Mistral Small · Dialers · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Allo, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Allo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JustCall27 of 343Not in the top three

Kixie18 of 340Not in the top three

CloudTalk17 of 341Not in the top three

PhoneBurner14 of 341Not in the top three

Ooma Office13 of 341Not in the top three

Aircall12 of 340Not in the top three

Orum10 of 340Not in the top three

RingCentral RingCX9 of 340Not in the top three

Dialpad8 of 341Not in the top three

Aloware6 of 342Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Allo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 34 answers that named Allo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

croclub.com5

withallo.com5

aloware.com4

cloudtalk.io4

justcall.io4

marketbetter.ai4

trellus.ai4

hotprospector.com3

kixie.com3

getvoip.com2

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Allo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

croclub.com/tools/best-sales-dialer-software5

withallo.com/blog/best-power-dialers5

aloware.com/blog/the-8-best-sales-dialers4

cloudtalk.io/blog/dialers-for-cold-calling4

marketbetter.ai/blog/best-sales-dialers-for-sdr-teams-20264

withallo.com/blog/cheap-power-dialers4

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-auto-dialer-software-for-small-businesses3

hotprospector.com/blog/best-affordable-power-dialers3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Allo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Allo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at allo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.