GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Skipcall · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Skipcall

20Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Dialers for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 13 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skipcall for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales dialers and callingSales0%16 of 768%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skipcall yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skipcall across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00112
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K212003
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“JustCall, Skipcall, Orum | Power + parallel dialing, better compliance tools” Kimi K2 · Dialers · negative prompt · first choice
“Reputable options: - Skipcall (parallel dialing with compliance features)” Mistral Small · Dialers · negative prompt · first choice
“Parallel dialers (like Skipcall, Nooks, Orum) are the dominant choice for US B2B outbound” MiniMax M2.5 · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative
“*Best for High-Volume Outbound Teams* - Built specifically for B2B SDR teams” Mistral Small · Dialers · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“criticized for high abandoned call rates (>3% FTC limit), risking TCPA fines” Grok 4.1 Fast · Dialers · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skipcall, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skipcall was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Orum18 of 201Not in the top three
CloudTalk15 of 203Not in the top three
Aircall15 of 200Not in the top three
JustCall15 of 200Not in the top three
Nooks14 of 201Not in the top three
Dialpad12 of 200Not in the top three
PhoneBurner11 of 201Not in the top three
Aloware10 of 208Not in the top three
Kixie10 of 202Not in the top three
Five99 of 201Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skipcall's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skipcall, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skipcall.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack