Index › Products › MobileMonkey · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

MobileMonkey

5Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MobileMonkey was named 3 times in Conversational mktg and 1 other category, where Tidio led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market77 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprise80 of 86

under the label threshold

In conversational mktg · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MobileMonkey for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Conversational marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	77 of 87	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13%
Chatbots and conversational AI for support	Customer	0%	107 of 114	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intercom Fin AI Agent at 41%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MobileMonkey yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MobileMonkey across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“All-in-one platform for SMS, Instagram, and website chat, very budget-friendly with generous free plan.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Conversational mktg · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid MobileMonkey unless you're doing light marketing automation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Support chatbots · negative prompt · hard negative

“Meta-dependent messaging builders: ManyChat, Chatfuel, MobileMonkey” Muse Glimmer 30B · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MobileMonkey, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MobileMonkey was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tidio4 of 51Not among the top eight

ManyChat3 of 51Not among the top eight

ChatGPT2 of 50Not among the top eight

Chatfuel2 of 50Not among the top eight

Drift2 of 50Not among the top eight

Intercom2 of 50Not among the top eight

Intercom Fin AI Agent2 of 50Not among the top eight

Ada1 of 51Not among the top eight

Freshworks Freddy AI Agent1 of 50Not among the top eight

Google Gemini1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MobileMonkey. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named MobileMonkey and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com3

botpenguin.com2

botsquad.ai2

g2.com2

rasa.com2

spotsaas.com2

tidio.com2

agentiveaiq.com1

apps.apple.com1

articsledge.com1

No domain is on file for MobileMonkey, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-chatbot-software2

spotsaas.com/product/mobilemonkey2

agentiveaiq.com/blog/is-your-ai-chat-app-safe-security-explained1

apps.apple.com/us/app/mobilemonkey-chat/id14819480821

articsledge.com/post/chatbot-support-software1

assembled.com/page/best-chatbots-customer-service1

bestdevops.com/top-10-customer-support-chatbots-features-pros-cons-comparison1

blog.9cv9.com/top-11-conversational-marketing-platforms-in-20251

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MobileMonkey

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MobileMonkey; a claim can dispute any of them.

MobileMonkey (now Instachamp) 1

Follow MobileMonkey

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MobileMonkey's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MobileMonkey, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MobileMonkey by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where MobileMonkey is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name MobileMonkey, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.