Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 73 → 83 of 107
1 category · Named, not rankedMirrorFly
13Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MirrorFly was named 7 times in In-app messaging, where Intercom led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business83 of 108
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 105
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 98
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In in-app messaging · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MirrorFly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 28 of 105 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MirrorFly held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · In-app messaging · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 26 of 96
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 29 of 97
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 28 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MirrorFly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MirrorFly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose MirrorFly if you need a free API for a long period without monthly costs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · In-app messaging · budget prompt · alternative
“Free "Easy" plan for basic messaging; paid plans from $399/month” Kimi K2 · In-app messaging · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MirrorFly, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MirrorFly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MirrorFly, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MirrorFly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MirrorFly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 13 answers that named MirrorFly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cometchat.com9
contus.com7
ethora.com7
guideflow.com7
pushwoosh.com6
trtc.io5
userpilot.com5
bizbot.com4
dupple.com4
getstream.io4
Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming MirrorFly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mirrorfly.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, MirrorFly takes 0% of first choices and Intercom takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mirrorfly.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, MirrorFly takes 0% of first choices and Intercom takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “in-app messaging platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best in-app messaging platform”
9
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 105 in in-app messaging
Segment leader
21%
Intercom
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mirrorfly.com
1,109
subdomains included
Content
203
counted in the table below
Documentation
832
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 130 | 7 | 2026-08-27 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 34 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2026-01-09 | ||
| Case study | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2024-11-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Livekit alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-27Build video kyc platform blog
- 2026-08-12Enterprise communication statistics report blog
- 2026-08-06Best white label cpaas providers blog
- 2026-08-05Slack app development blog
- 2026-07-29Cloud vs on premise chat security comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mirrorfly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MirrorFly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MirrorFly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MirrorFly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- MirrorFly is an AI-powered CPaaS platform offering fully customizable chatbot, agent, video, voice, chat, live-streaming, SIP/VoIP, and activity-feed APIs and SDKs for web and mobile apps.
- For
- Enterprises
- Price stated
- MirrorFly’s self-hosted communication solution is available for a custom pricing based on your unique enterprise requirements. mirrorfly.com/chat/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- No, MirrorFly does not offer a free trial. Instead you can access their free demo. mirrorfly.com/chat/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 15 mirrorfly.com · 100 mirrorfly.com/case-studies pages disagree
- Certifications
- HIPAAGDPROWASP Compatibility
- Customers named
- EjadaTrue Digital GroupMyGateTrueIDVoice Systems Engineering
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What MirrorFly's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mirrorfly.com, mirrorfly.com/chat/pricing, mirrorfly.com/chat/solutions, mirrorfly.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MirrorFly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MirrorFly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MirrorFly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MirrorFly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MirrorFly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.