GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Mention Me · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Mention Me

41Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Referrals for enterprise buyers
Rank 30 of 124 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In loyalty · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mention Me for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Loyalty, advocacy and referralsMarketing0%30 of 1240%7under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 24%
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel0%34 of 1070%4under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mention Me yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mention Me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00202
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative25 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative11 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong for mid-market and enterprise brands with data-driven CAC insights” MiniMax M2.5 · Referrals · direct prompt · alternative
“Pick Mention Me if referrals are the main growth lever.” Perplexity Sonar · Loyalty · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mention Me, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mention Me was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Extole35 of 419Not in the top three
Friendbuy32 of 410Not in the top three
Ambassador28 of 411Not in the top three
Talkable26 of 412Not in the top three
ReferralCandy24 of 413Not in the top three
Open Loyalty21 of 411Not in the top three
Yotpo19 of 411Not in the top three
Referral Rock16 of 412Not in the top three
Referral Factory15 of 412Not in the top three
LoyaltyLion15 of 411Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mention Me. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 41 answers that named Mention Me and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

extole.com3
mention-me.comYour site3
openloyalty.io2
aboutmartech.com1
affise.com1
ambassadorflow.com1
bioflow.io1
brierley.com1
cxtoday.com1
firstpromoter.com1

Twelve of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Mention Me came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mention Me's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mention Me, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mention-me.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack