GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Medallia Concierge · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Medallia Concierge

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Medallia Concierge was named 2 times in Feedback, where Google Forms led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Medallia Concierge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer feedback and surveysCustomer0%42 of 1040%2under 10 labels · led by Google Forms at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Medallia Concierge yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Medallia Concierge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zonka Feedback and Medallia Concierge have taken real market share in 2025-2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Medallia Concierge, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Medallia Concierge was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Qualtrics2 of 21Not in the top three
Zonka Feedback2 of 21Not in the top three
SurveyMonkey2 of 20Not in the top three
Retently1 of 21Not in the top three
Alchemer1 of 20Not in the top three
AskNicely1 of 20Not in the top three
Birdeye1 of 20Not in the top three
Canny1 of 20Not in the top three
Chattermill1 of 20Not in the top three
Enterpret1 of 20Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Medallia Concierge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Medallia Concierge and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deeto.com2
zonkafeedback.com2
blog.buildbetter.ai1
chattermill.com1
customergauge.com1
feeds.thedunvegangroup.com1
front.com1
getperspective.ai1
greatquestion.co1
guideflow.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Medallia Concierge came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Medallia is the company behind Medallia Concierge.
Website
medallia.com
Headquarters
Palo Alto, United States
Founded
2001

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Medallia Concierge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Medallia Concierge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at medallia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack