Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedMalbek
7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Malbek was named 3 times in CLM, where PandaDoc led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market46 of 63
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 65
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Malbek for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 46 of 63 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 23% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Malbek held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CLM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 42 of 60
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 20 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 46 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Malbek across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Malbek across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“consider independent platforms like Icertis, Ironclad, LinkSquares, Juro, or Malbek” Mistral Small · CLM · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“reviewers mention strong usability, but also platform reliability issues, cumbersome Word integration, product regressions” GPT-5.4 mini · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Malbek, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Malbek was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Malbek, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Malbek was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Malbek. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Malbek and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gartner.com4
bindlegal.com3
conga.com3
docusign.com3
g2.com3
haqq.ai3
larksuite.com3
agiloft.com2
ciopages.com2
icertis.com2
Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Malbek came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
malbek.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Malbek takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
malbek.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Malbek takes 0% of first choices and PandaDoc takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best contract lifecycle management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“malbek”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 8 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 36,984 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,116 · 337 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 806
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 46 of 63 in CLM
Segment leader
23%
PandaDoc
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on malbek.io
667
subdomains included
Content
567
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
14 · 37
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 541 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | CLM, CRM | |
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2025-07-22 | CLM, CPQ | |
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2024-08-16 | CLM | |
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-01-08 | CLM | |
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2024-11-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Contracts under pressure the manufacturers guide to clm blog
- 2026-09-18Contracts center of gravity buy side blog
- 2026-09-03Malbek envision 2026 smash mouth blog
- 2026-08-21Asc 606 revenue recognition blog
- 2026-07-21Malbek envision 2026 keynotes blog
- 2026-07-17Post quantum cryptography readiness blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page malbek.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Malbek
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Malbek.ShowHide
The company
Malbek.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- malbek.io
- Headquarters
- United States
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Improve contract management and document automation with Malbek's CLM software, equipped with AI-powered contract intelligence, automation, and compliance controls.
- For
- legal, procurement, finance and sales
- Price stated
- Pricing malbek.io
- Integrations claimed
- 50 malbek.io
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting, customers
What Malbek's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: malbek.io, malbek.io/plans, trust.malbek.io, malbek.io/platform, malbek.io/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Malbek's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Malbek, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Malbek by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Malbek is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Malbek, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.