AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › CobbleStone · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

CobbleStone

7Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CobbleStone was named 3 times in CLM, where PandaDoc led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CobbleStone for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Contract lifecycle management and e-signatureRevenue operations0%52 of 6333%3under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 23%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, CobbleStone held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CLM · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 of 60, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 31 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
CLM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 52 of 63, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated CobbleStone across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Draws strong dislike in public procurement contexts” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CobbleStone, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CobbleStone was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DocuSign CLM6 of 71Not among the top eight
Agiloft6 of 70Not among the top eight
Conga CLM6 of 70Not among the top eight
Ironclad6 of 70Not among the top eight
Icertis Contract Intelligence5 of 72Not among the top eight
LinkSquares4 of 70Not among the top eight
Sirion4 of 70Not among the top eight
Malbek3 of 70Not among the top eight
ContractPodAi2 of 70Not among the top eight
Coupa CLM2 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CobbleStone. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named CobbleStone and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

agiloft.com3
bindlegal.com3
conga.com3
docusign.com3
larksuite.com3
contracko.com2
g2.com2
gartner.com2
haqq.ai2
icertis.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming CobbleStone came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cobblestonesoftware.com
1,385
subdomains included
Content
1,307
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
17 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog751182026-09-29CLM, CRM
News or press27602026-01-30CLM
Conference or event184162026-10-01CLM
Webinar or virtual event4702025-10-31CLM
Glossary or explainer2732026-09-14
Case study6undated
Comparison612026-09-08CLM
Report or ebook402025-05-09
Template or tool4undatedCLM
Podcast or video202025-09-16

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cobblestonesoftware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as CobbleStone

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CobbleStone; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cobblestone 1

Follow CobbleStone

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CobbleStone is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Contract Management & Procurement Software
Free plan or trial
Free Trial cobblestonesoftware.com
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, certifications, hosting, customers

What CobbleStone's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cobblestonesoftware.com, cobblestonesoftware.com/products/legal-software. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CobbleStone's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CobbleStone, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CobbleStone by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CobbleStone is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CobbleStone, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cobblestonesoftware.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.