GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › ContractPodAi · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ContractPodAi

14Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ContractPodAi was named 6 times in CLM, where PandaDoc led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business54 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market54 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprise19 of 69

under the label threshold

In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ContractPodAi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	54 of 65	33%	6	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ContractPodAi yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ContractPodAi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for Mid-Market ... ContractPodAi — No published pricing, designed for large legal departments” Kimi K2 · CLM · direct prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise CLMs like Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Agiloft, or ContractPodAi” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ContractPodAi, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractPodAi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ironclad14 of 141Not in the top three

Agiloft13 of 140Not in the top three

DocuSign CLM13 of 140Not in the top three

Conga CLM12 of 140Not in the top three

Icertis11 of 141Not in the top three

Sirion9 of 141Not in the top three

LinkSquares9 of 140Not in the top three

Juro8 of 141Not in the top three

Concord6 of 142Not in the top three

PandaDoc5 of 141Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContractPodAi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 14 answers that named ContractPodAi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docusign.com2

icertis.com2

agiloft.com1

conga.com1

gartner.com1

help.sap.com1

ironcladapp.com1

linksquares.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming ContractPodAi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docusign.com/products/clm2

icertis.com/globalassets/1.-sections/research/ebooks/smarter-approach-to-contracts/a-smart2

agiloft.com/selecting-a-clm1

conga.com/resources/blog/conga-vs-ironclad-vs-docusign1

gartner.com/en/documents/58344471

gartner.com/en/documents/71597301

gartner.com/en/documents/79184091

gartner.com/reviews/market/advanced-contract-analytics1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ContractPodAi

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ContractPodAi; a claim can dispute any of them.

ContractPodAi (Leah) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContractPodAi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContractPodAi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contra.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.