Every category where a model named Magentrix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	16 of 50	14%	14	accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	49 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Magentrix yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Magentrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labels2

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your company is a dedicated Salesforce, HubSpot, or MS Dynamics shop... Magentrix is the best choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PRM · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Complex Workflows & Heavy CRM Customization ... Magentrix acts as a highly configurable bridge” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Needing deep customization ... Consider instead: Magentrix or Salesforce-native options” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · negative prompt · alternative

“Deep Salesforce/Dynamics customization ... Heavily customizable” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“worth evaluating only if you need more complete partner-program features and can handle a higher spend” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · budget prompt · soft negative

“it is still portal-first and has limited real-time collaboration, so it may be a poor fit” Perplexity Sonar · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Magentrix, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magentrix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Impartner27 of 347Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM25 of 341Not in the top three

PartnerStack23 of 342Not in the top three

Channelscaler21 of 340Not in the top three

Channeltivity20 of 343Not in the top three

Unifyr16 of 342Not in the top three

Kiflo14 of 342Not in the top three

ZINFI14 of 341Not in the top three

JourneyBee13 of 341Not in the top three

PartnerPortal.io12 of 344Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Magentrix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 34 answers that named Magentrix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

gartner.com4

learn.g2.com4

b2bsaasreviews.com3

gitnux.org3

guideflow.com3

journeybee.io3

monday.com3

partnerplace.io3

partnerportal.io3

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Magentrix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-prm-software4

b2bsaasreviews.com/top-partner-tools-in-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/partner-relationship-management-applications3

guideflow.com/blog/best-prm-software3

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/prm-software3

partnerplace.io/knowledge-base/what-are-the-best-prm-software-solutions-out-there-20263

worldmetrics.org/best/partner-relationship-management-software3

channelscaler.com/platforms/prm-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Magentrix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Magentrix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at magentrix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.