Every category where a model named MaestroQA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Contact center quality assurance	Customer	4%	6 of 81	19%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MaestroQA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MaestroQA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase22 labels10

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“## 1. MaestroQA (now Rippit) - Best for: Teams wanting highly customizable manual QA with structured coaching” Kimi K2 · Contact center QA · comparative prompt · first choice

“The Best Overall for Flexibility: MaestroQA ... is widely considered the gold standard for mid-to-large teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contact center QA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend MaestroQA as the default choice if your main need is support QA and conversation review” GPT-5.4 mini · Contact center QA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Often chosen by teams that want a more dedicated conversation analytics / quality management layer” GPT-5.4 mini · Contact center QA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid MaestroQA unless you need screen capture for compliance or have enterprise-level budgets” Kimi K2 · Contact center QA · direct prompt · hard negative

“MaestroQA reviewers noted it's "not user-friendly, and not intuitive to use" with metrics lacking in ease of use and functionality” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Contact center QA · negative prompt · soft negative

“MaestroQA, rebranded to Rippit... moving its core positioning away from traditional QA scorecards” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contact center QA · scale prompt · soft negative

“Need enterprise-grade calibration | MaestroQA (higher cost)” Kimi K2 · Contact center QA · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MaestroQA, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MaestroQA was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zendesk QA31 of 529Compare →

EvaluAgent27 of 526Compare →

Observe.AI26 of 523Not among the top eight

NICE CXone Quality Management20 of 522Not among the top eight

Scorebuddy19 of 523Compare →

Playvox14 of 521Compare →

Level AI12 of 522Compare →

Talkdesk12 of 520Not among the top eight

Voxjar9 of 524Not among the top eight

ScorebuddyCX9 of 523Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MaestroQA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 52 answers that named MaestroQA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com31

voxjar.com27

g2.com25

guideflow.com25

cloudtalk.io23

eesel.ai17

solidroad.com17

dialpad.com15

zendesk.com14

thelevel.ai12

206 of the 206 domain citations in answers naming MaestroQA came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

voxjar.com/best-call-center-quality-assurance-software-solutions27

learn.g2.com/best-contact-center-quality-assurance-software26

guideflow.com/blog/contact-center-quality-assurance-software25

g2.com/categories/contact-center-quality-assurance20

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-call-center-quality-assurance-software-based-on-g219

eesel.ai/blog/customer-support-quality-assurance-tools17

dialpad.com/blog/contact-center-quality-management-software15

quo.com/blog/customer-support-quality-assurance-tools10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

maestroqa.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MaestroQA takes 4% of first choices and EvaluAgent takes 28%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “contact center quality assurance tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best contact center quality assurance tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“maestroqa”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 575 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 260 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,212
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 81 in Contact center QA

Segment leader

28%

EvaluAgent

First choices: 10 across its categories
Named in: 52 answers
Its own site cited: in 51 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on maestroqa.com

540

subdomains included

Content

399

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

53 · 18

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Blog	244	undated
Case study	54	undated
Report or ebook	46	undated
Webinar or virtual event	32	undated
Comparison	13	undated
Conference or event	7	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page maestroqa.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as MaestroQA

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MaestroQA; a claim can dispute any of them.

MaestroQA (now Rippit) 2MaestroQA (by Genesys) 1MaestroQA (by Rippit) 1

Follow MaestroQA

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MaestroQA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MaestroQA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MaestroQA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where MaestroQA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name MaestroQA, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.