Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 31 → 14 of 108
1 category · Named, not rankedLifesight
13Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lifesight was named 4 times in Attribution & MMM, where Dreamdata led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 112
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 123
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 110
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lifesight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 28 of 123 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lifesight held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 17 → 26 of 112
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 8 → 26 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution & MMM | 1% | 0% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 1% → 0%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 28 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lifesight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lifesight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Platforms like `Lifesight`, `Measured`, and `Rockerbox` automate this by feeding MTA data into MMM for calibration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Single platform for multiple measurement techniques; agentic/MCP interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · alternative
“For slightly higher budgets - Starter plan around $5K per month” MiniMax M2.5 · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lifesight, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lifesight was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lifesight, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lifesight was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lifesight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Lifesight and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cometly.com10
improvado.io8
lifesight.ioYour site8
thecmo.com7
hyscaler.com5
factors.ai4
fibbler.co4
gartner.com4
guideflow.com4
mammoth.io4
Fifty of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Lifesight came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lifesight.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lifesight takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lifesight.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lifesight takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“lifesight”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 16 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,357 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,932 · 26 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,385
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $121 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 123 in Attribution & MMM
Segment leader
27%
Dreamdata
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lifesight.io
1,748
subdomains included
Content
1,071
counted in the table below
Documentation
170
Product · Integration
41 · 32
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 512 | 2 | 2026-09-08 | CDP | |
| Blog | 393 | 31 | 2026-09-22 | Ecommerce marketing, Identity | |
| Report or ebook | 55 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 38 | 7 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 26 | 10 | 2026-09-15 | CDP | |
| Case study | 19 | 0 | 2025-09-25 | ||
| News or press | 15 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2024-05-30 | Direct mail | |
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Best marketing forecasting tools blog
- 2026-09-22Kenneth wilbur humans of measurement blog
- 2026-09-21Holiday marketing strategy blog
- 2026-09-21Health marketing measurement blog
- 2026-09-21Measure mingle conference or event
- 2026-09-16Why robyn and meridian arent enough blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 8, 2026 to September 9, 2026MarTech World Forum (MWF) London 2026Victory Services Club, London, GB · attended
- September 2, 2026IAB Australia MeasureUp 2026: Marketing MeasurementBooth #310, NSW Teachers Federation Conference Centre, Sydney, Australia · exhibited
- August 10, 2026 to August 12, 2026eTail Boston 2026Sheraton Boston, Boston, US · exhibited
As the event pages on lifesight.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lifesight.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Lifesight
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lifesight.ShowHide
The company
Lifesight.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- lifesight.io
- Headquarters
- United States, Singapore
- Founded
- 2017
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic Unified Marketing Measurement
- For
- marketing teams, not data scientists
- Price stated
- We offer a single annual subscription for all modules within our platform that is dependent on your data and marketing maturity level. lifesight.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- No program fees, no certification fees. lifesight.io/partners
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPA/CPRASOC 2 Type IIHIPAAISO 27001SOC2 Type 2Unified Marketing Measurement CertificationUMM Certified: Foundations
- Customers named
- SeidenstickerObvia Real Estate Firma Leading Vapor BrandPremier Auto Dealership Chaina DTC Beauty branda Home accessories branda omni-channel Retailer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Lifesight's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lifesight.io, lifesight.io/pricing, lifesight.io/platform, lifesight.io/case-studies, lifesight.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lifesight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lifesight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lifesight by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lifesight is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lifesight, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.