GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Landbase · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Landbase

8Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Landbase was named 3 times in AI SDR and 1 other category, where Apollo.io led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Landbase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI SDR agentsSales0%45 of 710%2under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations0%77 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Landbase yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Landbase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise teams wanting truly autonomous end-to-end GTM execution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI SDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Landbase, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Landbase was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apollo.io5 of 81Not in the top three
11x5 of 80Not in the top three
Amplemarket4 of 82Not in the top three
Clay4 of 80Not in the top three
Cognism4 of 80Not in the top three
Reply.io3 of 81Not in the top three
Salesforce Agentforce3 of 81Not in the top three
ZoomInfo3 of 81Not in the top three
Artisan3 of 80Not in the top three
Salesloft3 of 80Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Landbase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 8 answers that named Landbase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

landbase.comYour site3
11x.ai2
amplemarket.com2
artisan.co2
fin.ai2
getbreakout.ai2
monday.com2
salesforge.ai2
saleshandy.com2
salesmotion.io2

Eighteen of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Landbase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Landbase

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Landbase; a claim can dispute any of them.
Landbase (GTM-1 Omni) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Landbase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Landbase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at landbase.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack