GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Artisan · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Artisan

102Judge labels
9First choices
38Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in AI SDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 71 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 42% of its 36 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Artisan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI SDR agentsSales13%2 of 7142%36criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Artisan yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Artisan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash21025
Perplexity Sonar20002
Grok 4.1 Fast02035
Mistral Small02013
DeepSeek V4 Flash12115
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K201045
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.501023

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels3
Paraphrase13 labels5
Comparative31 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels1
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative102 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“unless your team specifically wants an AI SDR that books meetings more autonomously, in which case Artisan is the better fit” Perplexity Sonar · AI SDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Artisan"s AI agent, Ava, is highly regarded for mid-market companies that want a fully autonomous out-of-the-box solution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SDR · direct prompt · first choice
“or Artisan/Ava if you want more autonomous outbound prospecting with built-in contact data.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Artisan if you want a broad, packaged SDR replacement.” Perplexity Sonar · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid fully autonomous AI SDRs with annual lock-in contracts, no trials, and documented quality problems (Artisan, 11x.ai especially)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Artisan - LinkedIn restricted their automated outreach in early 2026... G2 rating of 3.8/5 (lowest among reviewed platforms)” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Artisan was temporarily banned by LinkedIn in late 2025/early 2026 due to platform compliance and data-scraping violations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“ones to approach with high caution due to recurring complaints ... avoid if personalization or results are critical” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Artisan, over the 102 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Artisan was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
11x82 of 1025Not in the top three
AiSDR63 of 10214Not in the top three
Regie.ai36 of 1022Not in the top three
Clay32 of 1021Not in the top three
Reply.io23 of 1022Not in the top three
Qualified20 of 1021Not in the top three
Salesforce Agentforce17 of 1021Not in the top three
Agent Frank14 of 1021Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Artisan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 102 answers that named Artisan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

artisan.coYour site9
amplemarket.com7
salesforge.ai7
11x.ai6
getbreakout.ai6
getvoip.com6
monday.com5
saleshandy.com5
salesmotion.io5
lindy.ai4

Fifty-one of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Artisan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Artisan

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Artisan; a claim can dispute any of them.
Artisan (Ava) 22Artisan (Ava + Ava Inbound) 1Artisan (Ava AI Agent) 1Artisan AI (Ava) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Artisan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Artisan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at artisan.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.