GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Jitterbit · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Jitterbit

13Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jitterbit was named 6 times in Automation & iPaaS, where Workato led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise27 of 116

under the label threshold

In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jitterbit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	12 of 76	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jitterbit yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jitterbit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Jitterbit if you need strong hybrid integration and API development” Perplexity Sonar · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Budget-conscious mid-market, EDI + API coexisting | Value play” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · alternative

“Jitterbit - Best Budget-Friendly Option” Mistral Small · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Jitterbit - Best for API development” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jitterbit, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jitterbit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workato12 of 135Not in the top three

Celigo9 of 133Not in the top three

Boomi9 of 130Not in the top three

Zapier8 of 132Not in the top three

Make6 of 132Not in the top three

MuleSoft6 of 130Not in the top three

n8n6 of 130Not in the top three

Tray.ai5 of 130Not in the top three

Microsoft Power Automate4 of 131Not in the top three

SnapLogic4 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jitterbit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 13 answers that named Jitterbit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appseconnect.com2

dckap.com2

reply.com2

albato.com1

alphabold.com1

automationatlas.io1

cazoomi.com1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1

exalate.com1

findstack.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Jitterbit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

reply.com/valorem-reply/en/resources/insights/blog/10-best-ipaas-solutions2

albato.com/blog/publications/best-ipaas-solutions-in-2024-comprehensive-guide-to-integrati1

alphabold.com/choosing-the-right-ipaas-platform1

appseconnect.com/blog/13-best-ipaas-solutions1

appseconnect.com/top-10-ipaas-platforms-of-2026-for-cios-it-leaders1

automationatlas.io/answers/best-ipaas-platforms-20261

cazoomi.com/blog/top-ipaas-vendors-2025-comparison-features-pricing1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-ipaas-platforms/1267865431

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jitterbit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jitterbit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jitterbit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.