Every category where a model named SnapLogic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	6%	6 of 76	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SnapLogic yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SnapLogic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	3	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best workflow automation and integration platform for a mid-market B2B company is Workato, SnapLogic, or Boomi.” Llama 4 Maverick · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest evaluating Boomi or SnapLogic if you need enterprise-grade depth with unified governance” MiniMax M2.5 · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · first choice

“Workato/SnapLogic (enterprise iPaaS)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Automation & iPaaS · scale prompt · first choice

“Best for: AI-enhanced integration needs” MiniMax M2.5 · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SnapLogic, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SnapLogic was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workato15 of 176Not in the top three

Boomi13 of 171Not in the top three

Make12 of 173Not in the top three

Zapier12 of 172Not in the top three

MuleSoft11 of 170Not in the top three

Microsoft Power Automate9 of 170Not in the top three

n8n8 of 171Not in the top three

Celigo5 of 172Not in the top three

Tray.ai5 of 170Not in the top three

Jitterbit4 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SnapLogic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 17 answers that named SnapLogic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com2

snaplogic.comYour site2

activepieces.com1

alltomate.com1

apollo.io1

atlassian.com1

ayautomate.com1

bit-flows.com1

blog.hubspot.com1

brothersautomate.com1

Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming SnapLogic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/workflow-automation-platforms2

snaplogic.com/blog/workflow-automation-tools-mid-size-companies2

activepieces.com/blog/workflow-automation-for-small-business1

alltomate.com/blogs/best-ai-tools-for-small-business-automation1

apollo.io/insights/best-platform-for-building-an-agentic-gtm-workflow-at-a-mid-market-b2b-1

atlassian.com/agile/project-management/workflow-automation-software1

ayautomate.com/blog/best-workflow-automation-platforms1

bit-flows.com/blog/affordable-automation-tools-that-avoid-task-billing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SnapLogic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SnapLogic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at snaplogic.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.