Every category where a model named involve.me for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Landing pages and interactive content	Marketing	4%	9 of 78	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for involve.me yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated involve.me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels6

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“### Best for Mid-Sized B2B: Outgrow or involve.me” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“involve.me for interactive content” Perplexity Sonar · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you want a single tool to handle interactive lead generation and follow-up emails: Go with Involve.me” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Involve.me is an excellent alternative for more sophisticated needs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Solid ($29-129/mo) for quizzes/calculators on funnels, but less robust for standalone landing pages” Grok 4.1 Fast · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as involve.me, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and involve.me was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Unbounce14 of 162Not in the top three

Leadpages11 of 163Not in the top three

Instapage10 of 160Not in the top three

Outgrow7 of 163Not in the top three

Landingi6 of 160Not in the top three

Carrd5 of 160Not in the top three

Ceros4 of 160Not in the top three

HubSpot Landing Pages4 of 160Not in the top three

Swipe Pages4 of 160Not in the top three

GetResponse3 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named involve.me. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 16 answers that named involve.me and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

emailtooltester.com3

involve.meYour site3

perspective.co3

prismic.io3

profitbooks.net3

ventureharbour.com3

zapier.com3

zoho.com3

emailvendorselection.com2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming involve.me came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

emailtooltester.com/en/blog/best-landing-page-builder3

involve.me/blog/best-ai-landing-page-builders3

profitbooks.net/best-landing-page-builders3

ventureharbour.com/best-landing-page-builders3

zapier.com/blog/best-landing-page-builders3

zoho.com/landingpage/bootcamp/best-landing-page-builders.html3

emailvendorselection.com/best-landing-page-builders2

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-landing-page-builders2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as involve.me

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as involve.me; a claim can dispute any of them.

Involve.me 3

The company

involve.me.

Website: involve.me
Headquarters: Vienna, Austria
Founded: 2016

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when involve.me's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as involve.me, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at involve.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.