1 category · Ranked ClaimedHummingDeck
50Judge labels
8First choices
3Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Sales rooms for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 59 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 17 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 52
8%29 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 59
8%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise37 of 39
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In sales rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HummingDeck for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 8% | 4 of 59 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HummingDeck yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated HummingDeck across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative8 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels7
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want the absolute lowest entry price for a paid plan, go with HummingDeck” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“### Top Recommendation: HummingDeck (Best overall for budget-conscious small teams)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“HummingDeck ($25/user/mo) - Best overall value” Mistral Small · Sales rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“start with Aligned or HummingDeck” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales rooms · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HummingDeck, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HummingDeck was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HummingDeck. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 50 answers that named HummingDeck and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dock.us3
getaccept.com3
hummingdeck.comYour site3
learn.g2.com3
alignedup.com2
flowla.com2
g2.com2
gartner.com2
mindtickle.com2
omr.com2
Twenty-one of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming HummingDeck came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claimed
Claimed by HummingDeck
Verified contact: Ilya, Founder, HummingDeck, since September 16, 2026. Claiming changes nothing in the data: the labels, shares and verdicts on this page are the models' and the judge's alone.
Lean Deal Rooms for tracked sharing Description supplied by HummingDeck.