AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Ghost · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Ghost

13Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ghost was named 6 times in Marketing CMS, where HubSpot Content Hub led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In marketing cms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ghost for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Content management systems for marketing sitesMarketing0%11 of 550%6under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 42%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Ghost held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Marketing CMS · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 9 of 49
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 52
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Marketing CMS0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 11 of 55

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Ghost across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Content & Blogging Focus: Ghost ... a modern, lightweight alternative to WordPress” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing CMS · budget prompt · alternative
“a modern marketing-focused CMS (HubSpot CMS, Webflow, Ghost, or composable headless + frontend)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · alternative
“Ghost, which is ideal for publisher-style content operations” Llama 4 Maverick · Marketing CMS · budget prompt · alternative
“Ghost is best for email and newsletter-led businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ghost, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ghost was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
WordPress12 of 138Not among the top eight
Wix9 of 130Not among the top eight
HubSpot Content Hub8 of 132Not among the top eight
Squarespace8 of 131Not among the top eight
Webflow6 of 131Not among the top eight
Contentful3 of 130Not among the top eight
GoDaddy Website Builder3 of 130Not among the top eight
Sanity2 of 130Not among the top eight
Storyblok2 of 130Not among the top eight
Strapi2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ghost. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Ghost and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9
learn.g2.com6
deliberatedirections.com5
attractgroup.com4
blog.hubspot.com4
brightspot.com3
forbes.com3
impactplus.com3
kontent.ai3
linkedin.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Ghost came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ghost.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ghost takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 42%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “marketing website cms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing website cms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
550,000 a month (“ghost”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
379,144 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 48,814 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,770 · 486 in the top three
Sites linking to it
58,756
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 55 in Marketing CMS
Segment leader
42%
HubSpot Content Hub
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ghost.org
1,751
subdomains included
Content
459
counted in the table below
Documentation
761
Product · Integration
0 · 107
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog40102026-05-03
News or press2902021-06-14
Comparison21undated
Report or ebook3undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Conference or event1undated
Template or tool1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
Podcast or video1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ghost.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Ghost

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ghost.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
ghost.org

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Ghost is a powerful app for professional publishers to create, share, and grow a business around their content.
For
professional publishers
Price stated
Starter $15 USD / mo Billed yearly; Publisher $29 USD / mo Billed yearly; Business $199 USD / mo Billed yearly; Custom $Custom ghost.org/pricing
Starting price
15 ghost.org/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try Ghost completely free for 14 days ghost.org
Integrations claimed
8000 ghost.org/pricing
Certifications
Fastly
Customers named
Platformer404MediaLever NewsTangleThe BrowserGone With The WynnsCreator ScienceDESK Magazine
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Ghost's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ghost.org, ghost.org/pricing, ghost.org/themes/feature, ghost.org/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ghost's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ghost, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ghost by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Ghost is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ghost, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ghost.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.