GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Etsy · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Etsy

7Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Etsy was named 5 times in Ecommerce, where BigCommerce B2B Edition led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Etsy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Ecommerce platformsRevenue operations0%83 of 9860%5under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Etsy yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Etsy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“increasingly filled with resellers using automated bots to buy cheap inventory from China and mark it up as "handmade."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative
“you usually give up customer ownership and pay meaningful seller fees” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative
“be wary of platforms with opaque account-suspension practices (Etsy)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Etsy, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Etsy was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Shopify7 of 73Not in the top three
WooCommerce7 of 71Not in the top three
BigCommerce6 of 71Not in the top three
Ecwid4 of 70Not in the top three
Square Online3 of 71Not in the top three
PrestaShop3 of 70Not in the top three
Squarespace3 of 70Not in the top three
Wix3 of 70Not in the top three
Adobe Commerce2 of 70Not in the top three
AliExpress2 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Etsy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 7 answers that named Etsy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apparate.com.au1
bigcommerce.com1
blog.shift4shop.com1
blogrecode.com1
deliberatedirections.com1
digitalapplied.com1
ecommerceceo.com1
imakeable.com1
kyanon.digital1
nummbas.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Etsy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Q1353939 is the company behind Etsy.
Website
etsy.com
Headquarters
United States, Ireland
Founded
2005
Ownership
Public, ETSY on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Etsy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Etsy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at etsy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.