Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 of 67, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedElioplus
2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Elioplus was named 1 time in PRM, where PartnerPortal.io led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 69
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Elioplus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 25 of 61 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerPortal.io at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Elioplus held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PRM · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 of 59, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Elioplus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Elioplus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with a simpler, affordable solution (e.g., Elioplus, Unifyr” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PRM · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Elioplus, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elioplus was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Elioplus, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elioplus was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Elioplus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Elioplus and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
articsledge.com2
hamstergarage.com2
learn.g2.com2
zinfi.com2
backbase.com1
capterra.com1
channelinsider.com1
cinnalab.io1
cloudratings.com1
cpqclub.net1
Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Elioplus came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on elioplus.com
10,107
subdomains included
Content
71
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 37 | 19 | 2026-10-02 | PRM | |
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-02Meet singapores most influential it channel managers blog
- 2026-09-30Mdfs and how it vendors allocate channel marketing budgets blog
- 2026-09-22Leadfeeder api vs snitcher api vs ip to company api comparison
- 2026-09-17How to build a partner ecosystem strategy for your it business blog
- 2026-09-10Announcing the ip to company api by elioplus turn anonymous traffic into b2b revenue blog
- 2026-09-08How to set up a reseller program for a saas product a complete playbook blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page elioplus.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Elioplus
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Elioplus is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Elioplus is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Channel partners and software resellers network; "Recruit new channel partners and manage your partner network in an all-in-one solution."
- For
- IT software companies
- Price stated
- Join for free on our basic plan, upgrade or downgrade anytime. Completely free for channel partners. elioplus.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $298/month elioplus.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up free elioplus.com
- Customers named
- SAPFreshworksTD SYNNEXDVSAnalyticsRandstadLumarFireCompassNTT DATA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Elioplus's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: elioplus.com, elioplus.com/pricing, elioplus.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Elioplus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Elioplus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Elioplus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Elioplus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Elioplus, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.