GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Distributely · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Distributely

20Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Lead routing for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Distributely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lead routing and managementSales4%8 of 1040%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Distributely yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Distributely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most budget-conscious teams, Distributely (if on HubSpot) or LeadAngel (if multi-CRM) offer the best combination of features and affordability.” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · budget prompt · first choice
“If you already use HubSpot → Distributely ($75/month) is the most cost-effective option” MiniMax M2.5 · Lead routing · budget prompt · first choice
“HubSpot-native: RevenueHero or Distributely for HubSpot users” Mistral Small · Lead routing · negative prompt · alternative
“Distributely (HubSpot-only, budget option)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Distributely, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Distributely was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LeadAngel15 of 205Not in the top three
RevenueHero14 of 202Not in the top three
LeanData13 of 201Not in the top three
Chili Piper13 of 200Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub11 of 202Not in the top three
Kubaru9 of 201Not in the top three
Zoho CRM6 of 201Not in the top three
Default5 of 201Not in the top three
HubSpot CRM4 of 202Not in the top three
Pipedrive4 of 201Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Distributely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 20 answers that named Distributely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avoma.com1
bigcontacts.com1
cal.com1
cirrusinsight.com1
cleverly.co1
croclub.com1
default.com1
fitsmallbusiness.com1
getbreakout.ai1
improvado.io1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Distributely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Distributely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Distributely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at distribute.so is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack