GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Dianomi · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Dianomi

12Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dianomi was named 6 times in Native ads, where StackAdapt led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In native ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dianomi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Native and content advertisingMarketing2%6 of 720%6under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dianomi yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dianomi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels2
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Dianomi is the gold standard... If your goal is immediate brand trust and C-Suite reach, go with Dianomi.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Native ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best Niche Platform for Finance & Tech B2B: Dianomi is a premium, specialized native ad network” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Native ads · direct prompt · alternative
“or publisher-direct deals via Nativo/Dianomi for branded content” Kimi K2 · Native ads · negative prompt · alternative
“Finance/business-focused with premium publishers” Mistral Small · Native ads · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dianomi, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dianomi was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Teads11 of 120Not in the top three
Taboola10 of 122Not in the top three
StackAdapt9 of 126Not in the top three
Nativo8 of 120Not in the top three
Sharethrough6 of 121Not in the top three
TripleLift6 of 121Not in the top three
MGID6 of 120Not in the top three
Revcontent6 of 120Not in the top three
6sense3 of 121Not in the top three
Demandbase3 of 121Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dianomi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 12 answers that named Dianomi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

6sense.com1
aidigital.com1
business.quora.com1
digitaladvertisinghub.net1
g2.com1
getadlib.com1
gitnux.org1
guideflow.com1
improvado.io1
learn.g2.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Dianomi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Dianomi.
Website
dianomi.com
Headquarters
London
Founded
2003

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dianomi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dianomi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dianomi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.