GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Crowdfire · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Crowdfire

9Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Crowdfire was named 5 times in Social media, where Sprout Social led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business44 of 46

under the label threshold

Mid-market58 of 59

under the label threshold

Enterprise46 of 50

under the label threshold

In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Crowdfire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Social media management	Marketing	0%	58 of 59	100%	5	under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Crowdfire yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Crowdfire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Shutting down permanently on May 15, 2025—no new subs viable, data loss, no refunds for annual plans.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative

“High-Risk Platforms to Avoid ... Crowdfire ... Risk Score: 19/100 (highest among mainstream tools)” Mistral Small · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative

“Crowdfire — "mixed signals," follower-growth tool that pivoted to scheduling” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative

“Crowdfire (Risk Score: 19/100) - Has multiple documented complaints” MiniMax M2.5 · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Crowdfire, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Crowdfire was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hootsuite9 of 90Not in the top three

MeetEdgar7 of 90Not in the top three

Buffer6 of 92Not in the top three

Sprout Social6 of 91Not in the top three

Sprinklr6 of 90Not in the top three

Agorapulse5 of 92Not in the top three

SocialPilot5 of 91Not in the top three

CoSchedule5 of 90Not in the top three

Sendible4 of 90Not in the top three

Metricool3 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Crowdfire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 9 answers that named Crowdfire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

efficient.app1

fedica.com1

futuristicmarketingservices.com1

keomarketing.com1

laurenbeechingpr.com1

linkedin.com1

napoleoncat.com1

nextiva.com1

orlo.tech1

pammarketingnut.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Crowdfire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

efficient.app/best/social-media-management1

fedica.com/blog/best-social-media-manager-tools-comparison-guide1

futuristicmarketingservices.com/Blogs/social-media-marketing/social-media-management-tools1

keomarketing.com/social-media-management-platforms-truth1

laurenbeechingpr.com/blog/worst-to-best-the-social-platforms-you-should-be-using-and-my-ho1

linkedin.com/pulse/best-social-media-management-tools-2026-10-platforms-compared-kumar-jis1

napoleoncat.com/blog/social-media-management-tools1

nextiva.com/blog/hootsuite-alternatives.html1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crowdfire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crowdfire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdfire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.