| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail media platforms | Marketing | 2% | 10 of 121 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger | |
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 0% | 29 of 92 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 114 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Criteo is also repeatedly listed as best for cross-device targeting in retail media shortlists.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Retail media · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Criteo if you want a self-service retail media platform with campaign management and performance reporting.” Perplexity Sonar · Retail media · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“pair it with a multi-network platform like Pacvue or Criteo to manage campaigns centrally” GPT-5.4 mini · Retail media · direct prompt · alternative
“Named a Leader in IDC's 2024 Retail Media assessment; strong commerce media platform” Kimi K2 · Retail media · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to AVOID with Limited Budgets ... Built for scale; requires large catalogs” Kimi K2 · Retail media · budget prompt · hard negative
“entry threshold is high — self-serve starts around $10K/month ... likely too steep for a mid-market B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Retail media · direct prompt · soft negative
“Ad-tech companies involved in identity resolution” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 51 answers that named Criteo and are not a share of its labels.
154 of the 171 domain citations in answers naming Criteo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 546 | 15 | 2026-09-15 | Video ads | |
| Case study | 329 | 9 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 43 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ||
| News or press | 31 | 5 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Podcast or video | 10 | 0 | 2019-01-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 0 | 2020-06-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Every page criteo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Criteo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: criteo.com, criteo.com/br/security, criteo.com/go/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Criteo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Criteo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Criteo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: