Every category where a model named Kroger Precision Marketing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Retail media platforms	Marketing	0%	21 of 121	19%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kroger Precision Marketing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kroger Precision Marketing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Kroger Precision Marketing offers the deepest CPG targeting via loyalty card data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Retail media · comparative prompt · alternative

“A grocery-focused option built on Kroger loyalty and purchase data.” GPT-6 Luna · Retail media · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for personalized shopping data. Loyalty data depth via 84.51°” Muse Glimmer 30B · Retail media · comparative prompt · alternative

“operates one of the most sophisticated grocery-centric networks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Retail media · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“named in both the Chronicle Journal complexity piece and the AD-Times upfront crisis piece on CPM inflation and incrementality” Muse Glimmer 30B · Retail media · negative prompt · soft negative

“typically require high minimum spends or managed-service contracts to get started” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Retail media · budget prompt · soft negative

“but B2B audience is indirect (you sell to retailers who then sell to consumers)” MiniMax M2.5 · Retail media · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kroger Precision Marketing, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kroger Precision Marketing was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Walmart Connect42 of 428Not among the top eight

Amazon Ads35 of 4226Not among the top eight

Target Roundel35 of 420Not among the top eight

Instacart Ads32 of 423Not among the top eight

Criteo15 of 420Not among the top eight

Osmos9 of 420Not among the top eight

Skai8 of 421Not among the top eight

Pacvue8 of 420Not among the top eight

CitrusAd7 of 420Not among the top eight

Topsort7 of 420Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kroger Precision Marketing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 42 answers that named Kroger Precision Marketing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

osmos.ai27

guideflow.com23

improvado.io20

aidigital.com13

rmiq.net13

topsort.com13

us.fitgap.com13

fitsmallbusiness.com10

g2.com10

reportprime.com10

152 of the 152 domain citations in answers naming Kroger Precision Marketing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/retail-media-platforms23

improvado.io/blog/top-retail-media-networks20

osmos.ai/blog/retail-media-evolution-the-complete-guide15

aidigital.com/blog/retail-media-networks13

osmos.ai/blog/retail-media-marketplaces-retailers-platform-202612

topsort.com/post/best-retail-media-platforms12

fitsmallbusiness.com/guide-to-retail-media-for-smbs10

reportprime.com/retail-media-networks-r13793/company10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

krogerprecisionmarketing.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kroger Precision Marketing takes 0% of first choices and Amazon Ads takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “retail media advertising platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best retail media advertising platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“kroger precision marketing”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 23,435 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,777 · 16 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 713
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 121 in retail media

Segment leader

33%

Amazon Ads

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 42 answers
Its own site cited: in 42 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on krogerprecisionmarketing.com

482

subdomains included

Content

447

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	265	undated
Blog	136	4	2026-09-08
Podcast or video	28	undated
Case study	9	undated
Comparison	4	undated
Conference or event	2	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-08Kroger precision marketing introduces next generation creator commerce solutions blog
2026-08-11New ways to activate and extend reach in offsite media blog
2026-08-05Dont get left off the holiday table 4 ways to inspire shoppers this season blog
2026-08-03Kroger precision marketing launches shopping assistant plas product listing ads blog
2026-07-01Krogers christine foster says more brands are applying retail data to ctv campaign blog
2026-06-19Kroger precision marketing announces self service advertising with tiktok blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page krogerprecisionmarketing.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Kroger Precision Marketing

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Kroger Precision Marketing; a claim can dispute any of them.

Kroger Precision Marketing (KPM) 2

Follow Kroger Precision Marketing

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kroger Precision Marketing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kroger Precision Marketing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kroger Precision Marketing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Kroger Precision Marketing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kroger Precision Marketing, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.