AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Osmos · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Osmos

13Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Osmos was named 5 times in Retail media, where Amazon Ads led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In retail media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Osmos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Retail media platformsMarketing0%26 of 1210%5under 10 labels · led by Amazon Ads at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Osmos yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Osmos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Osmos is a white-label retail media operating system for retailers and marketplaces.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Retail media · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Osmos, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Osmos was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Walmart Connect11 of 133Not among the top eight
Amazon Ads10 of 136Not among the top eight
Target Roundel10 of 130Not among the top eight
Kroger Precision Marketing9 of 130Not among the top eight
Criteo8 of 131Not among the top eight
Instacart Ads8 of 130Not among the top eight
Topsort7 of 130Not among the top eight
Mirakl Ads5 of 131Not among the top eight
Skai5 of 131Not among the top eight
CitrusAd/Epsilon4 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Osmos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Osmos and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

osmos.aiYour site13
guideflow.com12
g2.com7
improvado.io7
topsort.com7
us.fitgap.com7
gartner.com6
slashdot.org6
aidigital.com5
adtelligent.com4

Sixty-one of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Osmos came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Osmos

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Osmos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Osmos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Osmos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Osmos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Osmos, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at osmos.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.