Every category where a model named Convoso for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	0%	21 of 76	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Aloware at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Convoso yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Convoso across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise compliance | Convoso | Deep compliance tooling, though verify contract terms” Kimi K2 · Dialers · negative prompt · alternative

“Five9 and Convoso are best for large enterprises with complex compliance needs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: High-volume outbound teams maximizing contact rates” Kimi K2 · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Five9's competitors also worth avoiding: Convoso Biggest concerns: Long setup, no published pricing, unexpected logouts, and a steep learning curve.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Convoso, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Convoso was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Five921 of 235Not in the top three

Orum17 of 234Not in the top three

CloudTalk15 of 230Not in the top three

Aloware12 of 235Not in the top three

JustCall12 of 231Not in the top three

NICE CXone11 of 233Not in the top three

Nooks10 of 233Not in the top three

PhoneBurner10 of 231Not in the top three

Aircall10 of 230Not in the top three

Kixie9 of 232Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Convoso. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 23 answers that named Convoso and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com1

trustpilot.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Convoso came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/compare/136728-164070/Readymode-vs-UJET1

capterra.com/compare/76768-164101/Cloud-Predictive-Dialer-vs-Call-Logic1

capterra.com/p/120329/AgentDialer1

capterra.com/p/146599/Sales-Intelligence1

capterra.com/telemarketing-software1

trustpilot.com/review/echonetservices.com1

trustpilot.com/review/mojosells.com1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Convoso's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Convoso, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at convoso.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.