| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact center platforms | Customer | 4% | 9 of 86 | 26% | 34 | criticized challenger | |
| AI voice agents | Customer | 0% | 36 of 103 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Retell AI at 27% | |
| Sales dialers and calling | Sales | 0% | 58 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CloudTalk at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“NICE is widely regarded as the market heavyweight, often scoring highest in both "ability to execute" and "completeness of vision."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contact center · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need complex omnichannel enterprise routing → Genesys is the incumbent leader.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contact center · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are a large enterprise with complex needs... Choose Genesys or NICE.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contact center · comparative prompt · first choice
“Need the most enterprise-proven all-around platform? Genesys or NICE.” GPT-5.4 mini · Contact center · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoiding the high-ticket enterprise suites like NICE CXone or Genesys (which can easily run $100–$200+ per agent monthly)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contact center · budget prompt · hard negative
“experienced professionals have warned others to "avoid NICE CXone like the plague."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contact center · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid or Be Cautious About ... Multiple outages ... Poor support” MiniMax M2.5 · Contact center · negative prompt · hard negative
“multiple reports of extended outages (some lasting 5+ hours) in recent years” Mistral Small · Contact center · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 141 of the 147 answers that named NICE CXone and are not a share of its labels.
417 of the 417 domain citations in answers naming NICE CXone came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What NICE CXone's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nice.com, nice.com/pricing, nice.com/products/cxone, nice.com/customer-stories, nice.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NICE CXone's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NICE CXone, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NICE CXone by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: