Every category where a model named Conversica for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Conversational marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	30 of 87	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13%
AI SDR agents	Sales	0%	24 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conversica yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conversica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	3	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excels at inbound lead nurture/qualification via email/SMS/chat; persistent multi-touch.” Grok 4.20 · AI SDR · direct prompt · alternative

“Conversica is best for automated conversational lead engagement.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Conversational mktg · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you need autonomous AI lead follow-up at scale → Conversica” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Conversational mktg · comparative prompt · alternative

“For inbound lead nurturing, Conversica is a strong contender.” Mistral Small · AI SDR · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“complaints include "robotic" conversations, high costs for scale, and limited workflow flexibility” Grok 4.20 · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conversica, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conversica was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Drift14 of 275Not among the top eight

Intercom11 of 272Not among the top eight

Qualified10 of 273Not among the top eight

Tidio10 of 271Not among the top eight

Artisan Ava7 of 274Not among the top eight

AiSDR7 of 271Not among the top eight

HubSpot Marketing Hub6 of 271Not among the top eight

LivePerson6 of 271Not among the top eight

Qualified Piper6 of 270Not among the top eight

Amplemarket Duo5 of 271Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conversica. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Conversica and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com15

thecmo.com12

g2.com10

storylane.io10

getperspective.ai8

artisan.co7

learn.g2.com7

wonderchat.io6

1mind.com5

cloudtalk.io5

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Conversica came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-conversational-marketing-software14

thecmo.com/tools/best-conversational-marketing-platform12

storylane.io/blog/conversational-marketing-software-b2b10

g2.com/categories/conversational-marketing9

getperspective.ai/blog/conversational-marketing-platforms-2026-9-tools-ranked-by-depth8

artisan.co/blog/the-best-ai-sdrs7

learn.g2.com/best-conversational-marketing-software7

1mind.com/blog-articles/the-6-best-conversational-marketing-platforms-in-20265

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

conversica.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Conversica takes 0% of first choices and Tidio takes 13%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “conversational marketing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,600 a month (“conversica”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 13 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,697 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 145 · 11 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,413
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 30 of 87 in conversational mktg

Segment leader

13%

Tidio

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on conversica.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

8 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Blog	12	undated
Case study	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page conversica.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Conversica

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Conversica.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: conversica.com

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Conversica’s AI Agents help you start effortless conversations with your customers that build trust, deepen relationships, and drive growth.
conversica.com
For: Teams that want to drive more revenue, provide a better fan experience, drive demand, resolve service issues, or retain customers.
conversica.com
Certifications: GDPRSOC 2ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IICOPPACCPAPCI-DSSISO-27001:2022
Hosting: USA
Customers named: New York IslandersUniversity of MiamiIron MountainPittsburgh PiratesLouisville City FC
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Conversica's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: conversica.com, trust.conversica.com, conversica.com/use-cases/ads, conversica.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conversica's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conversica, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conversica by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Conversica is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conversica, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.