Every category where a model named Coevera for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM	Revenue operations	4%	5 of 71	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coevera yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coevera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the recommended CRM for a mid-sized B2B company would be Coevera, as it is considered the best overall for mid-market B2B companies” Llama 4 Maverick · CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The best CRM for a mid-market B2B company is Coevera, according to a comparative analysis of top 5 CRMs for the mid-market.” Llama 4 Maverick · CRM · direct prompt · first choice

“Coevera if your mid-market process is more structured and you want a specialized B2B fit.” Perplexity Sonar · CRM · direct prompt · alternative

“Great alternative to Salesforce if you prioritize simplicity and visual clarity.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coevera, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coevera was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pipedrive5 of 61Not in the top three

Salesforce Sales Cloud5 of 60Not in the top three

Zoho CRM5 of 60Not in the top three

Freshsales4 of 60Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub3 of 63Not in the top three

HubSpot CRM3 of 61Not in the top three

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales3 of 60Not in the top three

Salesflare3 of 60Not in the top three

Close1 of 60Not in the top three

Copper1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coevera. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named Coevera and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

analyticsinsight.net1

authencio.com1

blog.salesflare.com1

clarify.ai1

clickup.com1

findstack.com1

highlevelautomationteam.com1

miniloop.ai1

monday.com1

nutshell.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Coevera came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

analyticsinsight.net/tech-news/best-revops-tools-for-mid-market-b2b-sales-teams-in-20261

authencio.com/blog/best-crm-for-b2b-saas-companies-the-definitive-guide1

blog.salesflare.com/best-b2b-crm1

clarify.ai/blog/best-crms-for-b2b-sales-teams1

clickup.com/blog/b2b-crm-software1

findstack.com/software/crm/s/mid-market1

highlevelautomationteam.com/best-crm-software-in-the-world-20261

miniloop.ai/blog/b2b-crm1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Coevera

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Coevera; a claim can dispute any of them.

Coevera (formerly Pipeliner) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coevera's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coevera, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coevera.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.