GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › BuzzStream · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

BuzzStream

8Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BuzzStream was named 3 times in PR and 1 other category, where Muck Rack led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market56 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BuzzStream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
PR and media monitoring	Marketing	0%	56 of 65	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 24%
Influencer platforms	Marketing	0%	66 of 79	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BuzzStream yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BuzzStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“It is an execution/pitching tool, not a monitoring platform.” Perplexity Sonar · PR · negative prompt · hard negative

“start around $49/month, though you may outgrow basic platforms as your program expands” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BuzzStream, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BuzzStream was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Alerts6 of 80Not in the top three

Semrush AI PR Toolkit5 of 83Not in the top three

Brand245 of 81Not in the top three

Muck Rack5 of 81Not in the top three

Mention5 of 80Not in the top three

Meltwater3 of 81Not in the top three

Awario2 of 80Not in the top three

Cision2 of 80Not in the top three

Prezly2 of 80Not in the top three

Buffer1 of 81Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BuzzStream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 8 answers that named BuzzStream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

improvado.io2

pr.co2

prlab.co2

prowly.com2

reddit.com2

agiled.app1

amt.ai1

artisan.co1

barchart.com1

blog.hootsuite.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming BuzzStream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

improvado.io/blog/best-digital-pr-tools-and-software2

pr.co/pr-resources/best-pr-tools2

agiled.app/blog/best-tools-for-marketers-and-pr-professionals1

amt.ai/blog/best-influencer-marketing-tools1

artisan.co/blog/outreach-tools1

barchart.com/story/news/338558/20-best-press-release-distribution-tools-of-20261

blog.hootsuite.com/influencer-marketing-tools1

bringseo.com/top-b2b-influencer-platforms-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BuzzStream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BuzzStream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at buzzstream.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.