Index › Vendors › Box · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Box

6Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Box was named 3 times in CLM and 2 other categories, where PandaDoc led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market62 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Box for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	62 of 65	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25%
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	29 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Canto at 34%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	39 of 59	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Box yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Box across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A well-organized, strictly managed file-sharing app (like Box or Google Drive with forced folder naming conventions) is usually enough.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“a DMS like SharePoint, Google Drive, or Box...Why to avoid:” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative

“standard Box plans lack the advanced "VDR features" needed for finance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Box, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Box was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Drive5 of 60Not in the top three

SharePoint5 of 60Not in the top three

Brandfolder3 of 61Not in the top three

Dropbox3 of 60Not in the top three

OneDrive3 of 60Not in the top three

Bynder2 of 61Not in the top three

Canto2 of 61Not in the top three

Widen/Acquia2 of 61Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Manager Assets2 of 60Not in the top three

Aprimo2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Box. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named Box and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aprimo.com1

business.adobe.com1

bynder.com1

celum.com1

cmswire.com1

daminion.net1

frontify.com1

getmasset.com1

hyland.com1

lingoapp.com1

No domain is on file for Box, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

aprimo.com/blog/best-digital-asset-management-enterprise1

aprimo.com/blog/how-to-choose-the-right-dam-system-for-enterprise-marketing1

business.adobe.com/blog/basics/digital-asset-management1

bynder.com/en/what-is-digital-asset-management1

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems1

cmswire.com/digital-asset-management/examining-19-enterprise-digital-asset-management-solu1

daminion.net/articles/tools/dam-software1

frontify.com/en/guide/digital-asset-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Box's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Box, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.