Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedBoogieBoard
5Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BoogieBoard was named 4 times in Territory planning, where CaptivateIQ Planning led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market13 of 123
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise59 of 92
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BoogieBoard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 13 of 123 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, BoogieBoard held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 35 → 12 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 49 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 13 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BoogieBoard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BoogieBoard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“a dedicated territory engine (like Fullcast, BoogieBoard, or similar) ... may be a better fit than heavy enterprise platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · first choice
“Dedicated RevOps & Account Carving | Fullcast, BoogieBoard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Very low entry cost compared to competitors like eSpatial ($7,995+/year) or BoogieBoard ($999+/month).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BoogieBoard, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoogieBoard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BoogieBoard, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoogieBoard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoogieBoard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named BoogieBoard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
captivateiq.com3
guideflow.com3
lative.ai3
pipeline.zoominfo.com3
g2.com2
gitnux.org2
gradient.works2
learn.g2.com2
prospeo.io2
varicent.com2
Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming BoogieBoard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on boogieboard.ai
411
subdomains included
Content
380
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 357 | 25 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 0 | 2026-03-08 | ||
| Case study | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2025-07-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-03-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2023-08-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-11Sales territory plan sample for 2026 blog
- 2026-08-09Acceptable variance blog
- 2026-08-07Why frontline empathy makes better revenue op blog
- 2026-08-05Sales manager territory review blog
- 2026-08-04Best quota planning software to optimize perf blog
- 2026-08-02Account count per territory blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page boogieboard.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as BoogieBoard
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BoogieBoard; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gradient Works / BoogieBoard 1
Follow BoogieBoard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BoogieBoard is its own company.ShowHide
The company
BoogieBoard is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-driven territory planning platform that creates optimal sales territories in minutes, not months.
- For
- Revenue Operations Teams, Sales Leaders, RevOps Professionals
- Price stated
- Starter $999 per month, Pro $1,999 per month, MAX $2,999 per month boogieboard.ai/pricing
- Starting price
- 999 boogieboard.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Integration Setup boogieboard.ai/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 3 boogieboard.ai/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- Challenger IncWatershedSanaFundraise UpChallenger Inc.ChallengerFullstoryBeeline
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What BoogieBoard's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: boogieboard.ai, boogieboard.ai/pricing, trust.boogieboard.ai, boogieboard.ai/product, boogieboard.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoogieBoard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoogieBoard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BoogieBoard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BoogieBoard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BoogieBoard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.