GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › BetterContact · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

BetterContact

4Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BetterContact was named 4 times in Enrichment and 1 other category, where Apollo.io led with 70%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market17 of 56

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In enrichment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BetterContact for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data enrichment	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	17 of 56	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 70%
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	0%	94 of 104	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BetterContact yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BetterContact across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“waterfall enrichment tools like BetterContact and FullEnrich offer the lowest cost-per-contact” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Enrichment · comparative prompt · alternative

“BetterContact starts at $15/month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enrichment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Lowest cost but limited scope” Mistral Small · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BetterContact, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BetterContact was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io4 of 43Not in the top three

FullEnrich4 of 40Not in the top three

Lusha4 of 40Not in the top three

Clay3 of 41Not in the top three

Cognism3 of 40Not in the top three

HubSpot Breeze Intelligence3 of 40Not in the top three

ZoomInfo3 of 40Not in the top three

BookYourData2 of 40Not in the top three

6sense1 of 40Not in the top three

Adapt1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BetterContact. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 4 answers that named BetterContact and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

6sense.com1

cleanlist.ai1

knock-ai.com1

salesgenie.com1

sbl.so1

smarte.pro1

snov.io1

Seven of the seven domain citations in answers naming BetterContact came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

6sense.com/blog/best-b2b-data-enrichment-tools1

cleanlist.ai/blog/15-best-b2b-data-enrichment-providers-in-2025-ranked1

knock-ai.com/blog/data-enrichment-tools1

salesgenie.com/blog/best-b2b-data-enrichment-tools1

sbl.so/blog/best-b2b-data-enrichment-tools1

smarte.pro/blog/b2b-data-enrichment1

snov.io/blog/data-enrichment-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as BetterContact

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BetterContact; a claim can dispute any of them.

BetterContact/FullEnrich 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BetterContact's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BetterContact, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bettercontact.rocks is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.