Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 26 of 42
2 categories · Named, not rankedAWeber
14Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AWeber was named 6 times in Email marketing and 1 other category, where HubSpot Marketing Hub led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business33 of 49
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 66
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise44 of 51
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In email marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AWeber for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 28 of 66 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 57 of 59 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AWeber held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 27 of 65
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 65 → 40 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 28 of 66 |
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 57 of 59 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AWeber across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AWeber across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AWeber ($19/mo) | Both provide live support” MiniMax M2.5 · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the cited review says it has limited automation options and outdated, glitch-prone templates” Perplexity Sonar · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why to avoid: These are technically Email Service Providers (ESPs), not automation platforms.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“their visual automation builder is often considered outdated and clunky” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AWeber, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWeber was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AWeber, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWeber was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWeber. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 14 answers that named AWeber and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
emailtooltester.com4
emailvendorselection.com4
brevo.com3
capterra.com3
forbes.com3
klaviyo.com3
mailchimp.com3
blog.hubspot.com2
engagebay.com2
hostinger.com2
Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming AWeber came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
aweber.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AWeber takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Marketing Hub takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
aweber.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AWeber takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Marketing Hub takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“aweber”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 85 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 17,325 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,365 · 136 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 45,230
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 66 in email marketing
Segment leader
35%
HubSpot Marketing Hub
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on aweber.com
1,744
subdomains included
Content
194
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,540
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 72 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 52 | 0 | 2026-03-02 | ||
| Blog | 28 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | Landing pages | |
| Report or ebook | 10 | 0 | 2025-03-25 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | ||
| News or press | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2025-03-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-11-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Share your new landing page anywhere blog
- 2026-09-182375 comparison
- 2026-08-25Chatgpt and claude now analyzes your email automations blog
- 2026-08-18Ai landing page builder blog
- 2026-08-10Aweber claude connector blog
- 2026-08-06Sent messages graphs blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page aweber.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AWeber
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AWeber; a claim can dispute any of them.
Aweber 1
Follow AWeber
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AWeber is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AWeber is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Email marketing platform for small businesses, creators, and entrepreneurs.
- For
- small businesses, creators, and entrepreneurs
- Price stated
- free plan and paid plans from $15/month aweber.com
- Starting price
- 15/month aweber.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan available; 14-day free trial available. aweber.com
- Integrations claimed
- 750 aweber.com
- Customers named
- Jamila BannisterJay BaerAbbey HertzlerPaula RizzoDean McMenamin
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What AWeber's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aweber.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWeber's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWeber, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWeber by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AWeber is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWeber, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.