Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 8% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 3 → 15 of 94
3 categories · Named, not rankedApptivo
10Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Apptivo was named 6 times in Territory planning and 2 other categories, where CaptivateIQ Planning led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 103
4%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market33 of 123
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Apptivo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 33 of 123 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| CRM | Revenue operations | 0% | 32 of 64 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 59% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 56 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Apptivo held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 32 of 116
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 33 of 123 |
| CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 32 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Apptivo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Apptivo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cheapest Option: Apptivo (If you need territory management + CRM together)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
“3. Apptivo - Most Cost-Friendly” Kimi K2 · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Apptivo, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Apptivo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Apptivo, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Apptivo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Apptivo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Apptivo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fitsmallbusiness.com7
prospeo.io7
guideflow.com5
abacum.ai4
gitnux.org4
nutshell.com4
espatial.com3
forbes.com3
g2.com3
itechguides.com3
Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Apptivo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on apptivo.com
70
subdomains included
Content
60
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 33 | 0 | 2024-12-27 | CRM, CDP | |
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2020-10-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2024-12-27 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2021-04-13 |
Most recent
- 2024-12-27Role of crm in travel and tourism industry blog
- 2024-12-27What is crm technology glossary or explainer
- 2024-12-27Everything you need to know about the annual maintenance contract blog
- 2024-12-27Cannibalization rate in sales and marketing apptivo blog
- 2024-12-27What is a system how to create a successful system glossary or explainer
- 2024-12-27What is lead generation types of lead generationexamples and best practices glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page apptivo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Apptivo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Apptivo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Apptivo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Business Management Software
- For
- enterprise management
- Free plan or trial
- 14 Days Free Trial apptivo.com
- Certifications
- SSAE18 SOC2 Type II
- Customers named
- Project ProductionsWindows ReportNoble Environmental TechnologiesHI-TECH Business SystemsElevate Biz IncPrecision Machine & ManufacturingCounty Chambers of Arizona, llcNaturalSci Regulatory Consulting Corp.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Apptivo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: apptivo.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Apptivo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Apptivo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Apptivo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Apptivo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Apptivo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.