GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Mapline · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Mapline

13Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mapline was named 6 times in Territory planning, where CaptivateIQ led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mapline for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Territory and quota planningRevenue operations2%13 of 1030%6under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mapline yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mapline across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best sales territory and quota planning tool is Mapline, particularly its free Starter plan.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Territory planning · budget prompt · first choice
“Mapline (paid) – Spreadsheet-to-map speed, strong for Excel-heavy teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Mapline free tier — For quick spreadsheet visualization” MiniMax M2.5 · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
“Mapline (Best for zero-cost start)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mapline, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mapline was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MapBusinessOnline11 of 132Not in the top three
Salesforce Maps9 of 130Not in the top three
Maptive8 of 131Not in the top three
Apptivo7 of 131Not in the top three
Badger Maps6 of 130Not in the top three
Pipedrive6 of 130Not in the top three
QuotaPath5 of 131Not in the top three
eSpatial5 of 131Not in the top three
AlignMix5 of 130Not in the top three
BatchGeo4 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mapline's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mapline, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mapline.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.