Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 16 of 48
3 categories · Named, not rankedAgile CRM
9Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Agile CRM was named 5 times in CRM and 2 other categories, where HubSpot CRM led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 51
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market42 of 64
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Agile CRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 0% | 42 of 64 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 59% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 42 of 116 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 30 of 64 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Agile CRM held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CRM · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 of 55, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 64, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 116, unchanged |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 64, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Agile CRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Agile CRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Forbes Advisor puts it at top of free CRMs with "a free plan for 10 users and 1,000 contacts"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Value selling · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if You Don't Have a CRM Yet: Agile CRM (Built-in Gamification)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales gamification · budget prompt · alternative
“Go with Agile CRM if you need marketing automation included” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Worst customer service" — frequently cited in reviews” Kimi K2 · CRM · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agile CRM, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agile CRM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agile CRM, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agile CRM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agile CRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Agile CRM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
forbes.com4
techradar.com4
agilecrm.comYour site3
brocoders.com3
capterra.com3
g2.com3
guideflow.com3
leaderboarded.com3
nethunt.com3
pipedrive.com3
Twenty-nine of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Agile CRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on agilecrm.com
304
subdomains included
Content
46
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 22 | undated | CRM | ||
| Blog | 10 | undated | CRM, Scheduling | ||
| Case study | 8 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page agilecrm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Agile CRM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Agile CRM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Agile CRM (Built-in Gamification) 1Agile CRM Free 1
Follow Agile CRM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Agile CRM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Agile CRM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agile CRM Software is the best, easy, powerful yet affordable Customer Relationship Management (CRM) with sales and marketing automation for small businesses.
- For
- small businesses
- Price stated
- FREE for 10 Users. No credit card required. agilecrm.com
- Starting price
- 0 agilecrm.com
- Free plan or trial
- FREE for 10 Users. No credit card required. agilecrm.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 agilecrm.com/pricing
- Customers named
- ClicDataPromptCloudYeah!LocalHarpBeatCareer Strategies GroupTerza FactorUcaDOMVP Legal Solutions
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Agile CRM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: agilecrm.com, agilecrm.com/pricing, trust.agilecrm.com, agilecrm.com/case-studies, agilecrm.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agile CRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agile CRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Agile CRM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Agile CRM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Agile CRM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.