Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 54 of 61
3 categories · Named, not rankedAdsterra
7Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adsterra was named 4 times in Native ads and 2 other categories, where StackAdapt led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business59 of 65
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market73 of 86
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise75 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In native ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adsterra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native and content advertising | Marketing | 0% | 73 of 86 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Video advertising | Marketing | 0% | 53 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adsterra held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Native ads · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 70 of 79
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 of 65, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native ads | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 73 of 86 |
| Programmatic | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 92, unchanged |
| Video ads | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 91 → 53 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adsterra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adsterra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for performance/affiliate traffic: PropellerAds, RichAds, Adsterra, or ExoClick[4]” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Networks to note: Adsterra, PropellerAds, RichAds ... their traffic quality is notoriously low for traditional, white-hat advertisers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Native ads · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adsterra, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adsterra was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adsterra, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adsterra was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adsterra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Adsterra and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
aidigital.com4
epom.com3
realize.com3
reddit.com3
youtube.com3
coinis.com2
dstudio.consulting2
fraudlogix.com2
g2.com2
getadlib.com2
Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Adsterra came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on adsterra.com
880
subdomains included
Content
810
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 703 | 57 | 2026-09-21 | SEO, Mobile apps | |
| Case study | 51 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | SEO, Mobile apps | |
| Report or ebook | 22 | 0 | 2026-05-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 0 | 2025-10-30 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2025-07-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-12-29 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2024-10-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-30 | SEO |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Software advertising adsterra cipiai case study case study
- 2026-09-28Affiliate marketing case studies case study
- 2026-09-21Publisher monetization strategies blog
- 2026-09-21Traffic monetization blog
- 2026-09-16Event blogging case study case study
- 2026-09-16Blogging for money blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page adsterra.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (23); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Adsterra
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adsterra.ShowHide
The company
Adsterra.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- adsterra.com
- Headquarters
- Limassol District, Cyprus
- Founded
- 2013
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Top online advertising network. Cost-effective HQ traffic for advertisers. The highest-paying ad network for publishers willing to monetize their inventory.
- For
- brands, agencies, and media buyers
- Price stated
- The minimum deposit depends on the payment method you select. For instance, for Paxum, deposits start from $100. ... For CPM and CPC campaigns, the minimum total and daily budget should be at least $25. adsterra.com
- Starting price
- 100 adsterra.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Adsterra's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: adsterra.com, adsterra.com/pricing-models. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adsterra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adsterra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adsterra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adsterra is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adsterra, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.