GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ad Geeks · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Ad Geeks

7Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ad Geeks was named 2 times in Programmatic, where StackAdapt led with 61%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business20 of 75

under the label threshold

Mid-market63 of 96

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In programmatic · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ad Geeks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Programmatic and display advertising	Marketing	0%	63 of 96	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 61%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ad Geeks yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ad Geeks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you want enterprise DSP access without a huge commitment: Ad Geeks” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Minimum spend: $5,000/month (but no formal floor)” Mistral Small · Programmatic · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ad Geeks, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ad Geeks was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

StackAdapt7 of 73Not in the top three

Amazon DSP7 of 70Not in the top three

AdRoll6 of 73Not in the top three

DV3606 of 70Not in the top three

Choozle5 of 70Not in the top three

The Trade Desk5 of 70Not in the top three

Google Ads3 of 71Not in the top three

Adform3 of 70Not in the top three

ad:personam2 of 72Not in the top three

Meta Ads2 of 71Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ad Geeks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 7 answers that named Ad Geeks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adgeeks.agencyYour site2

adwave.com2

aidigital.com2

blasto.ai2

getadlib.com2

heysid.com2

improvado.io2

inbeat.co2

reddit.com2

syntermedia.ai2

Eighteen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Ad Geeks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

adgeeks.agency/news/best-programmatic-advertising-agencies-for-small-businesses-in-20262

adwave.com/resources/best-programmatic-advertising-platforms2

aidigital.com/blog/programmatic-advertising-platforms2

blasto.ai/blog/programmatic-advertising-platforms-tools-ultimate-guide-to-platforms-agenci2

getadlib.com/blog/top-programmatic-advertising-tools2

heysid.com/resources/best-programmatic-advertising-platforms-for-b2b2

improvado.io/blog/top-programmatic-platforms2

inbeat.co/articles/top-programmatic-advertising-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ad Geeks

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ad Geeks; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ad Geeks (Partner Access) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ad Geeks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ad Geeks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adgeeks.agency is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.