Every category where a model named Accord for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	11 of 59	12%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Accord yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Accord across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“especially useful for mutual action plans and shared timelines” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Both tools specialize in Mutual Action Plans (MAPs).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

“7. Accord — *Best for mutual action plan tracking*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong mutual action plan focus; process-driven” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid platforms like ... Accord ($99/user + platform fee)” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · budget prompt · hard negative

“CAUTION for Flexible Teams” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Accord, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Accord was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Trumpet31 of 327Not in the top three

GetAccept30 of 323Not in the top three

DealHub28 of 321Not in the top three

Aligned27 of 326Not in the top three

Highspot22 of 321Not in the top three

Seismic21 of 320Not in the top three

Dock20 of 323Not in the top three

MindTickle18 of 323Not in the top three

Allego18 of 320Not in the top three

Flowla16 of 323Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Accord. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 32 answers that named Accord and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com6

g2.com5

showpad.com3

dock.us2

flowla.com2

getaccept.com2

hummingdeck.com2

mindtickle.com2

alignedup.com1

allego.com1

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Accord came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-digital-sales-room-solutions-for-enterprises5

learn.g2.com/best-digital-sales-room-software3

showpad.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-a-ranked-comparison-20263

dock.us/library/digital-sales-room-software2

flowla.com/blog/digital-sales-room-software-comparison2

g2.com/categories/digital-sales-room2

g2.com/categories/digital-sales-room/enterprise2

getaccept.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Accord

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Accord; a claim can dispute any of them.

Accord/Allego 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Accord's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Accord, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at accord.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.