GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Proximity › Estimote vs InMarket
Retail, proximity and IoT marketing · September 2026 Edition

Estimote vs InMarket

Zero of twelve models named Estimote first on the direct prompt; one named InMarket. Estimote was named by ten of the twelve models and InMarket by seven and Estimote carries 21 labels and InMarket 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Estimote

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

InMarket

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels2110A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Estimote reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Radar was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Radar vs Estimote · Radar vs InMarket · GroundTruth vs Estimote

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the retail, proximity and iot marketing page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EstimoteFirst choices, of twelve modelsInMarket
Direct011 against Estimote
Paraphrase00
Comparative01
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against InMarket
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Estimote and InMarket were named in the same answer fourteen times, of the 48 answers naming Estimote and the 33 naming InMarket. In those answers InMarket took the first choice one time and Estimote two.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Estimote and InMarket stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Estimote InMarket first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Estimote on the left and InMarket on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Estimote and InMarket stood in it.

InMarket first, Estimote not the choice

1 of 12 modelsEstimote was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Llama 4 MaverickInMarket alternatives: Apollo.io, Foursquare

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarPropensity alternatives: Estimote, InMarket
GLM 4.7 FlashXRadar alternatives: InMarket

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Gimbal, GroundTruth, Simpli.fi
GPT-5.4 miniFoursquare Proximity alternatives: 6sense, Demandbase
Gemini 3.5 FlashUniqode alternatives: Purple, Radar
Grok 4.1 FastCleverTap alternatives: PlotProjects, Simpli.fi
Mistral SmallFoursquare, Radar alternatives: CleverTap, Insider, Kontakt.io, Kumulos, PlotProjects
DeepSeek V4 FlashGroundTruth, StackAdapt alternatives: Hey Sid, InZynk, Radar
Qwen 3.7 FlashRadar alternatives: Foursquare, Kontakt.io
Kimi K2Radar alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Phunware, PlotProjects
MiniMax M2.5Radar

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Estimote leads by five points.
Estimote5%#4 of 7
InMarket0%#– of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Estimote2%#6 of 8
InMarket2%#7 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: InMarket leads at enterprise.
InMarket5%#6 of 9
Estimote0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Estimote

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“skip beacon hardware — it requires physical installation and app opt-in” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“start with GroundTruth (if you want managed campaigns) or Estimote (if you want to deploy your own beacons)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Estimote / beacon platforms: best if you need beacon-triggered engagement across locations.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“One of the original pioneers of beacon technology, Estimote manufactures high-end BLE beacons” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative

What the models said about InMarket

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“settlements against location data sellers like InMarket (2024: banned from selling precise data without consent, forced data deletion)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best proximity marketing platform for a mid-market B2B company is Inmarket, as it scored highest across the combined criteria” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Need to prove sales impact? Choose InMarket.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“InMarket: best if your company actually runs physical-location campaigns” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.