Every category where a model named xAmplify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	4%	7 of 108	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	20 of 50	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for xAmplify yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated xAmplify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	2	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained16 labels6

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best through-channel marketing automation (TCMA) platform is xAmplify” Kimi K2 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“Top recommendation: xAmplify” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“AI-driven platform with auto co-branded campaigns - Designed for partners with limited marketing time” MiniMax M2.5 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · alternative

“If you run on modern SaaS/HubSpot and want fast setup: Choose xAmplify” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited features - Basic PRM functionality that may not scale” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as xAmplify, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and xAmplify was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Impartner23 of 380Not in the top three

Unifyr21 of 383Not in the top three

ZINFI18 of 383Not in the top three

Channelscaler17 of 384Not in the top three

Kiflo16 of 382Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM11 of 380Not in the top three

PartnerPortal.io10 of 386Not in the top three

Channeltivity10 of 383Not in the top three

JourneyBee10 of 381Not in the top three

PartnerStack6 of 381Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named xAmplify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 38 answers that named xAmplify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net2

6sense.com1

braze.com1

clicksgeek.com1

digitalhill.com1

ecosystem.hubspot.com1

extu.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

improvado.io1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming xAmplify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

6sense.com/blog/best-b2b-marketing-automation-platforms1

braze.com/resources/articles/cross-channel-marketing-platform1

clicksgeek.com/best-marketing-channels-for-small-business1

digitalhill.com/blog/top-channel-partner-marketing-agencies-software-comparison1

ecosystem.hubspot.com/marketplace/listing/xamplify-2045991

extu.com/blog/through-channel-marketing-software-comparison1

g2.com/categories/through-channel-marketing1

g2.com/categories/through-channel-marketing/small-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as xAmplify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as xAmplify; a claim can dispute any of them.

XAmplify 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when xAmplify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as xAmplify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at xamplify.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.