GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Writesonic · October 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Writesonic

12Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

3Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Writesonic was named 6 times in AI marketing agents and 2 other categories, where HubSpot Breeze led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 140

under the label threshold

Mid-market46 of 157

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai marketing agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Writesonic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI marketing agents	Marketing	0%	46 of 157	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24%
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	0%	54 of 78	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	85 of 135	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Writesonic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Writesonic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for B2B teams scaling high-volume blog and landing page output with built-in SEO optimization” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Content marketing · direct prompt · alternative

“want SEO guidance built into the writing experience, Writesonic is a strong choice” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SEO · direct prompt · alternative

“Best Value for SEO-Focused B2B Content” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Budget-Friendly Option: Writesonic” Kimi K2 · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Examples: Jasper (with no human review), Writesonic, Rytr, basic ChatGPT wrappers.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SEO · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Writesonic, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Writesonic was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Jasper6 of 121Not among the top eight

Copy.ai5 of 120Not among the top eight

Semrush4 of 122Not among the top eight

Ahrefs4 of 120Not among the top eight

HubSpot Content Hub3 of 121Not among the top eight

Canva2 of 120Not among the top eight

ChatGPT2 of 120Not among the top eight

Clearscope2 of 120Not among the top eight

Frase2 of 120Not among the top eight

Moz2 of 120Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Writesonic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Writesonic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com5

fueler.io3

g2.com3

trysight.ai3

1mind.com2

aidigital.com2

arahi.ai2

cited.so2

cluelessbusinessowner.com2

contentoo.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Writesonic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

1mind.com/blog-articles/ai-marketing-automation-platforms-2026-buyers-guide2

aidigital.com/blog/best-ai-marketing-platform-comparison2

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/ai-tools-for-b2b-marketing2

cited.so/blog/jasper-ai-alternative2

cluelessbusinessowner.com/digital-marketing-scams-and-bad-decisions2

exploreai.directory/reviews/jasper-vs-copyai-vs-writesonic2

factors.ai/blog/b2b-ai-marketing-automation-buyer-guide2

folk.app/articles/best-marketing-ai-agents2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

writesonic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Writesonic takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Breeze takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 4,400 a month (“writesonic”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 93 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 31,287 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,337 · 56 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 20,211
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

10 ads · 10 text · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2026, as Writesonic, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 10 in the year. 6 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 46 of 157 in AI marketing agents

Segment leader

24%

HubSpot Breeze

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on writesonic.com

487

subdomains included

Content

267

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 25

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	173	11	2026-09-24	SEO
Comparison	60	4	2026-09-25	SEO
Case study	15	1	2026-07-17
Glossary or explainer	9	0	2026-05-20
Conference or event	4	4	2026-10-08
Report or ebook	4	1	2026-09-14
Template or tool	2	1	2026-07-01

Most recent

2026-10-08Brightonseo uk october 2026 conference or event
2026-09-25Semrush alternatives comparison
2026-09-24Citation decay blog
2026-09-22Retail show australia 2026 conference or event
2026-09-17Getting started with writesonic september 2026 conference or event
2026-09-15Brightonseo san diego conference or event

Events in person

Last twelve months

October 8, 2026 to October 9, 2026Meet Writesonic at brightonSEO UKThe Brighton Centre, Brighton, United Kingdom · hosted
September 22, 2026 to September 24, 2026Meet Writesonic at Retail Show AustraliaMelbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, Melbourne, Australia · hosted

As the event pages on writesonic.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page writesonic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Writesonic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Writesonic is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The AI Search Growth Engine. GEO, AEO, and AI visibility in one platform.
writesonic.com
For: Marketing teams
writesonic.com
Price stated: Starter $79, Basic $199, Growth $399, Enterprise Custom writesonic.com/pricing
Starting price: $79 writesonic.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start 7-Day Free Trial writesonic.com
Integrations claimed: 7 writesonic.com · 4 writesonic.com/pricing · 20 writesonic.com/integrations pages disagree
Certifications: SOC 2 (TYPE II)GDPR COMPLIANTHIPAA COMPLIANTSINGLE SIGN ONSOC 2 Type IIHIPAAGDPRSSO/SAML
Customers named: AmazonUnileverAcerNP DigitalMaestraCyeraReplyOECD
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Writesonic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: writesonic.com, writesonic.com/pricing, trust.writesonic.com, writesonic.com/customers, writesonic.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Writesonic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Writesonic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Writesonic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Writesonic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Writesonic, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.