GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Workday CLM · September 2026 Edition

Workday · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Workday CLM

18Judge labels

0First choices

8Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workday CLM was named 8 times in CLM, where PandaDoc led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business53 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market61 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 69

under the label threshold

In clm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workday CLM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	61 of 65	50%	8	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday CLM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday CLM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Legacy agreement estate needing extraction and analytics: Evisort.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Evisort leads on AI-first analytics” Llama 4 Maverick · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reviewers report a steep configuration learning curve and weaker support for editing and complex redlining” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

“be cautious if you want a standalone vendor, because it is described as having been acquired by Workday” Perplexity Sonar · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Moderate Caution (Depends on Your Situation)... Avoid if: You're not on Workday already” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Acquired by Workday - No longer operates as an independent platform” Mistral Small · CLM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday CLM, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday CLM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DocuSign CLM17 of 181Not in the top three

Ironclad15 of 184Not in the top three

Sirion14 of 183Not in the top three

Agiloft13 of 181Not in the top three

Conga CLM13 of 180Not in the top three

LinkSquares12 of 180Not in the top three

Icertis11 of 185Not in the top three

Juro11 of 182Not in the top three

Coupa6 of 180Not in the top three

Malbek6 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday CLM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 18 answers that named Workday CLM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com3

docusign.com2

g2.com2

icertis.com2

aibusinessgeek.com1

apps365.com1

aws.amazon.com1

bindlegal.com1

capterra.com1

checkbox.ai1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Workday CLM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/en/documents/71597302

gartner.com/reviews/market/contract-life-cycle-management2

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-clm-software-20261

apps365.com/blog/contract-lifecycle-management-challenges1

aws.amazon.com/marketplace/reviews/reviews-list/B093CLFW5X1

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/best-clm-tools1

capterra.com/p/10027704/CLM-3651

capterra.com/p/119589/DocusignCLM1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday CLM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday CLM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Evisort 5Evisort (now Workday CLM) 1Evisort (now owned by Workday) 1Workday Contract Lifecycle Management 1

The company

Workday, Inc. is the company behind Workday CLM.

Website: workday.com
Headquarters: Pleasanton, United States
Founded: 2005
Employees: about 20,000 (2025)
Ownership: Public, WDAY on Nasdaq

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday CLM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday CLM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.