Every category where a model named Icertis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	65 of 65	56%	27	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Icertis yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Icertis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	4	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2	4
Mistral Small	0	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	2	3
Kimi K2	0	1	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels3

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative23 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative24 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Icertis or Sirion if you are a large enterprise (1,000+ users) needing massive scale” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Sirion or Icertis if: You are a global, highly audited enterprise” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Regulated industries: Icertis” MiniMax M2.5 · CLM · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best for large-enterprise contract intelligence and governance: Icertis.” GPT-5.4 mini · CLM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Icertis consistently ranks at or near the top of the "approach with caution" list... Who should avoid: Any organization under ~500 employees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Platforms built for massive enterprises—such as Icertis, Oracle Agile...are often dangerous bets for small to mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative

“you do not need—and should actively avoid—heavy enterprise-grade CLM systems (like Icertis or Sirion)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CLM · scale prompt · hard negative

“Avoid for Mid-Market - Icertis — Enterprise-only, complex implementation, $180K+ starting price” Kimi K2 · CLM · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Icertis, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Icertis was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ironclad84 of 9015Not in the top three

Agiloft66 of 903Not in the top three

DocuSign CLM66 of 902Not in the top three

Conga CLM57 of 900Not in the top three

Sirion54 of 904Not in the top three

Juro35 of 9011Not in the top three

LinkSquares34 of 902Not in the top three

ContractSafe22 of 9010Not in the top three

PandaDoc22 of 904Not in the top three

Concord19 of 901Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Icertis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 90 answers that named Icertis and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ironcladapp.com9

bindlegal.com7

conga.com6

gartner.com6

getaccept.com6

learn.g2.com6

sirion.ai6

docusign.com4

g2.com4

icertis.comYour site4

Fifty-four of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Icertis came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ironcladapp.com/journal/contract-management/best-contract-management-tools7

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/best-enterprise-clm6

getaccept.com/blog/best-contract-management-software6

conga.com/resources/blog/contract-management-tools5

bindlegal.com/resources/best-software/best-clm-tools4

gartner.com/reviews/market/contract-life-cycle-management4

learn.g2.com/best-clm-software4

procurementmag.com/top10/top-10-clm-platforms-based-on-annual-revenue4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Icertis.

Website: icertis.com
Headquarters: Bellevue, United States
Founded: 2009

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Icertis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Icertis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at icertis.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.