Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 13 of 51
1 category · Named, not rankedWebinarGeek
10Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WebinarGeek was named 2 times in Webinars, where Livestorm led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 52
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market27 of 67
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In webinars · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WebinarGeek for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 0% | 27 of 67 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WebinarGeek held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Webinars · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 26 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 27 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WebinarGeek across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WebinarGeek across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Platforms like Demio, Livestorm, or WebinarGeek allow presenters and attendees to join with a single click” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · first choice
“WebinarGeek is a hidden gem for budget-conscious companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WebinarGeek, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WebinarGeek was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WebinarGeek, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WebinarGeek was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WebinarGeek. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named WebinarGeek and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
livestorm.co8
easywebinar.com7
blog.hubspot.com4
ewebinar.com4
g2.com4
remo.co4
webinarninja.com4
whova.com4
airmeet.com3
capterra.com3
Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming WebinarGeek came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
webinargeek.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WebinarGeek takes 0% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
webinargeek.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WebinarGeek takes 0% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“webinargeek”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,016 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 917 · 35 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,478
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 67 in webinars
Segment leader
25%
Livestorm
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on webinargeek.com
5,432
subdomains included
Content
604
counted in the table below
Documentation
215
Product · Integration
20 · 36
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 362 | 0 | 2021-07-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 179 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 11 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2019-12-03 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2021-01-04 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-048 audience engagement tactics glossary or explainer
- 2024-05-0910 best ai video editors glossary or explainer
- 2021-07-26Create on demand webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2021-07-26Growing your leads with the webinar channel webinar or virtual event
- 2021-07-26How to make a registration page glossary or explainer
- 2021-07-26Optimize the registration process with integrations glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page webinargeek.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow WebinarGeek
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WebinarGeek is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WebinarGeek is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- WebinarGeek is easy-to-use webinar software to easily reach your audience and host professional webinars!
- For
- AV partners
- Price stated
- Pricing webinargeek.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial webinargeek.com
- Customers named
- Baumer GroupDeutsche Post DHLHoorayHRNies Cools
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What WebinarGeek's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: webinargeek.com, trust.webinargeek.com, webinargeek.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WebinarGeek's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WebinarGeek, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WebinarGeek by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WebinarGeek is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WebinarGeek, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.