Every category where a model named Upfluence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	2%	11 of 79	31%	32	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Upfluence yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Upfluence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	2	5
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	3	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	1	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative28 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained11 labels2

Negative16 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“include GRIN, Upfluence, and CreatorIQ for comprehensive, AI-driven campaign management” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · comparative prompt · first choice

“All-in-one mid-market/DTC | GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence | ... sweet spot for your size” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice

“Runner-up: If your B2B company has strong ecommerce components, Upfluence would be an excellent second choice.” Mistral Small · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Brands wanting robust AI-powered discovery across multiple social platforms simultaneously.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid: ... Upfluence ... too expensive or not optimized for B2B LinkedIn-focused campaigns” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Aspire, Upfluence, CreatorIQ \u2014 typically $2,000+ per month with annual contracts” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · hard negative

“1. Upfluence ⚠️ HIGH CAUTION Major Issues: - Predatory contract practices” Kimi K2 · Influencer · negative prompt · hard negative

“Standard DTC tools like Upfluence or GRIN are often ill-suited for B2B” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Upfluence, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Upfluence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GRIN73 of 809Not in the top three

CreatorIQ62 of 8022Not in the top three

Aspire53 of 801Not in the top three

Modash49 of 8013Not in the top three

Traackr35 of 805Not in the top three

HypeAuditor27 of 801Not in the top three

Afluencer23 of 804Not in the top three

Heepsy22 of 803Not in the top three

Shopify Collabs20 of 803Not in the top three

Collabstr17 of 804Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Upfluence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 80 answers that named Upfluence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upfluence.comYour site6

creatoriq.com5

grin.co5

sproutsocial.com5

aspire.io4

guideflow.com4

influee.co4

influencermarketinghub.com4

modash.io4

businessofapps.com3

Thirty-eight of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Upfluence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

grin.co/compare4

guideflow.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms4

influee.co/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms4

sproutsocial.com/insights/influencer-marketing-platforms4

upfluence.com/pricing4

businessofapps.com/marketplace/influencer-marketing/platforms3

influencermarketinghub.com/top-influencer-marketing-platforms3

toolradar.com/guides/best-influencer-marketing-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Upfluence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Upfluence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at upfluence.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.